Opinion Survey - Should foids be allowed on .cc

[Kaligula567]

i think gayposting is allowed here
@Administrator @Halhal @Kaligula567 @Johan
we can implement @Randomized Shame s ideas or whatever i dnr tbh

lol, ye he did say valid stuff

 

[Kaligula567]

I have nothing to say about Kali's e-relationship with RRM ngl.

it's lowkey peak ngl, you guys missing out, ye yk how good it is to tell your irl strugles to a foid and she calls me smart all the time as well

 

[Kaligula567]

over for nigaligula

dnr

 

[eren]

it's lowkey peak ngl, you guys missing out, ye yk how good it is to tell your irl strugles to a foid and she calls me smart all the time as well

She never did ts

 

[Sink]

it's lowkey peak ngl, you guys missing out, ye yk how good it is to tell your irl strugles to a foid and she calls me smart all the time as well

She's fucking chad rn as we speak wrap it up

 

[Kaligula567]

She never did ts

she did yo

 

[Kaligula567]

She's fucking chad rn as we speak wrap it up

cope

 

[eren]

She's fucking chad rn as we speak wrap it up

Ye ngl this nigga tumor kept tagging me in expose threads about her and on tiktok idk why

 

[Determinism]

and you guys wonder why you're incels

 

[eren]

View attachment 1053

and you guys wonder why you're incels

Ye bro because ur gonna have sex with a foid on looksmax.cc

 

[Determinism]

Ye bro because ur gonna have sex with a foid on looksmax.cc

could always exchange some nudes! or even meet up, like those redditors do in the comments on porn videos

 

[Administrator]

Wouldn't that break the "the unconditional right to privacy" line in the Constitution?

As someone who moderates forums on both sides of the debate, I think outright banning either gender is just a moderation nightmare. It makes people very paranoid, it forces people to give up their privacy for the sake of verification, and all you have to do is accuse someone of being the other gender to force them through the verification process. I personally think it's a waste of time for content moderators to be trying to spot a "gender" out rather than just enforcing content policies.

The primary concerns with .com's multi-gendered approach is there's just two different cultures and people don't like it. I think both genders contribute the same amount of slop and the same amount of shit questions. Men don't like the women's humor and the women don't like the men's humor. I don't think it actually has anything to do with the "value" either gender provides, but rather than the value they provide is different. Men's tutorials are just simply different than the women's.

Most of the issues have to do with e-dating. But it's very easy to enforce, you just ban people who mention it or act gay (matching profile pictures, etc).

I think focusing on trying to be niche/gatekeeping by adding new rules that blocks certain types of users instead of simply making it not appealing to normies on a content level would be defeat the overall objective you're trying to achieve with the "no rules" sales pitch.

Some websites will have etiquette recommendations or community culture expectations posts. These technically are not rules, but it teaches users what kind of culture you're trying to aim for and you can remove users under the assumption they're not a fit culturally in the community, which you have established is how you want removals to work most of the time. It would make sense it should be up to the community to determine what fits culturally.

The concern about it happening "too often" is putting the cart before the horse. You would learn how to deal with issues once you actually face them. If it happens then you would address it then, not before.

high iq and you are absolutely correct ,we wouldn't be able to pass that rule either

I love the take tho you are completely correct

We finalised posting an act to actually make no amendments to the site, since that we don't explicitly have rules for or against women being here, we will address issues as they arise

 

[Determinism]

high iq and you are absolutely correct ,we wouldn't be able to pass that rule either

I love the take tho you are completely correct

We finalised posting an act to actually make no amendments to the site, since that we don't explicitly have rules for or against women being here, we will address issues as they arise

So that means foids are allowed? No! Not my incel site!

 

[Grilldaddy❤️]

No