Wheat Waffles, is personally one of my favourite BP youtubers, he has a really strong understanding of dating theory and is a fairly accurate rater
He claims to be around a 6/10 in real life appeal, and has moderate success with womne, often telling us about times he received S tier choosing signals, but he doesn't bend the truth. He also tells us about all his failures after approaches.
Anyways let's get to it and find out, whether I agree with his 6/10 claims!
Wheat has a midface ratio of 1.02 which is basaically the ideal, only slightly too compact. But it is basically in that ideal range, so we will award him with +1 points here
Wheat has a face width to heigh ratio , of 1.85. This is again in the ideal range so we will award him +1 points here
Wheat has a 1.59 ratio here, this is again in the ideal range, this comes from his good nose width and good wide mouth +1 points here
Wheat has a ratio here of 2.65 which falls massively out of the 2-2.25 range, this gives him a point of +0.7
His jaw width is 86% of the bizygomatic width, this is 4% less than the ideal, meaning he has a slightly less wide jaw than ideal. Not massively so ,however. So we will award him +0.9
0.46 is his ratio here. This is ideal . +1 points
Wheat has a Gonial angle of 117 which is ideal, so we can give him +1 points
Wheat has posutuve canthal tilt of around 3-4 degrees which falls into the ideal range. So +1 point here.
As we can see wheat has fairly even facial fifths so we can award +0.9 points for this proportion too
So with his important ratios and proportions into account, we will give him a weighted average of ratios of (0.9+1+1+1+0.9+0.7+1+1+1 = 8.5/ 8.5/9 = 0.94 approx)
This ratio average means he is not significantly deformed from the ratios region and isn't held back by a proportions or ratios area, which is good.
But unfortunately that is juyst about whjere the good ends,
the rest are failos:
Light brows, not prominant
Average Eye Shape
Poor Skin Tone
Poor Hair color
Bad hairstyle
Not sharp jaw
No bone prominance
With his ratios being good but no striking features or areas of looks to give him halos (usually in the jaw or eye area, assuming that the ratios don't wreck harmony) we rate him as plain average. 5/10.
However he does look better now in real life compared to these photos , so I would agree with him, and i would say he is a 6/10
He claims to be around a 6/10 in real life appeal, and has moderate success with womne, often telling us about times he received S tier choosing signals, but he doesn't bend the truth. He also tells us about all his failures after approaches.
Anyways let's get to it and find out, whether I agree with his 6/10 claims!
Midface Ratio
Wheat has a midface ratio of 1.02 which is basaically the ideal, only slightly too compact. But it is basically in that ideal range, so we will award him with +1 points here
FWHR
Wheat has a face width to heigh ratio , of 1.85. This is again in the ideal range so we will award him +1 points here
Mouth to nose ratio
Wheat has a 1.59 ratio here, this is again in the ideal range, this comes from his good nose width and good wide mouth +1 points here
Chin to philtrum
Wheat has a ratio here of 2.65 which falls massively out of the 2-2.25 range, this gives him a point of +0.7
Bizygomatic to bigonial
His jaw width is 86% of the bizygomatic width, this is 4% less than the ideal, meaning he has a slightly less wide jaw than ideal. Not massively so ,however. So we will award him +0.9
Eye Separation Ratio
0.46 is his ratio here. This is ideal . +1 points
Gonial Angle
Wheat has a Gonial angle of 117 which is ideal, so we can give him +1 points
Canthal Tilt
Wheat has posutuve canthal tilt of around 3-4 degrees which falls into the ideal range. So +1 point here.
Facial Fifths
As we can see wheat has fairly even facial fifths so we can award +0.9 points for this proportion too
Final Rating
So with his important ratios and proportions into account, we will give him a weighted average of ratios of (0.9+1+1+1+0.9+0.7+1+1+1 = 8.5/ 8.5/9 = 0.94 approx)
This ratio average means he is not significantly deformed from the ratios region and isn't held back by a proportions or ratios area, which is good.
But unfortunately that is juyst about whjere the good ends,
the rest are failos:
Light brows, not prominant
Average Eye Shape
Poor Skin Tone
Poor Hair color
Bad hairstyle
Not sharp jaw
No bone prominance
With his ratios being good but no striking features or areas of looks to give him halos (usually in the jaw or eye area, assuming that the ratios don't wreck harmony) we rate him as plain average. 5/10.
However he does look better now in real life compared to these photos , so I would agree with him, and i would say he is a 6/10
