Rating How Attractive is Androgenic?

[Administrator]

Androgenic is a famous australian roids mogger. He is well known for his huge frame, dimorphic look and tall height.

And he had one hell of an ascension!

Let's begin and see just how attractive he is on paper!

​

Midface Ratio​

Androgenic has a great compact midface, very close to the ideal of 1 exactly he has a ratio of 1.04, this is close enough for us to give him the full +1 points for this area

FWHR​

Androgenic has a face width to height ratio of 1.886 which is in the ideal of 1.8+ so again is awarded the full +1 points

Mouth to nose ratio​

He has the ratio of 1.5 here which again falls into the exact ideal range, so we will give him again +1 points for this area too!

Chin To Philtrum Ratio​

Androgenic has a ratio of 2.79 here, however this falls slightly on the high end of the looksmax.cc WARS ratio, but acccording to some rating scales 2.2-2.8 is the ideal range for the chin to philtrum. Since it looks good but is definitely slightly larger than the aesthetic ideal (this is one reason he does look very high t and ogre) we will award him +0.9 points

Bizygomatic to Bigonial width​

​

Androgenics jaw width is 89% of his bizygomatic which is basically ideal, we could be harsh and say he is 1% off of the ideal, but I would argue that is insignificant, so we award him the full +1 points

Eye Separation Ratio​

Androgenic has approximately 0.49 for his ESR falling slightly outside of the ideal range of 0.45 - 0.47 (this is due to his high facial width), But it is essentially ideal we award him +0.9 points

Gonial Angle​

Androgenic has the gonial angle of 111 degrees. This is slightly less than the ideal range but very close we will award him 0.9 for this area too.

Canthal Tilt​

Androgenuc has positive canthal tilt with an angle of ~ 7 degrees, this is near ideal +1points

Facial Fifths​

Androgenic has fairly even facial widths so we award him 0.8 points for this.

Total Rating​

With the WARS rating averaging at (0.8+1+0.9+0.9+1+0.9+1+1+1 = 8.5
8.5 / 9 ~ 0.94

This is incredible, his ratios are near perfect, lets add his tall height (he claims 6'4) good frame and great body,

He also has great jawline, a great eye area with good lashes and brows, good coloring too

we rate androgenic an 8.5-9/10 in real life appeal!

Do you guys agree with this rating? And who should we rate next?

 

[homiespidy]

Androgenic is a famous australian roids mogger. He is well known for his huge frame, dimorphic look and tall height.

And he had one hell of an ascension!

Let's begin and see just how attractive he is on paper!

​

Midface Ratio​

View attachment 110

Androgenic has a great compact midface, very close to the ideal of 1 exactly he has a ratio of 1.04, this is close enough for us to give him the full +1 points for this area

FWHR​

View attachment 111

Androgenic has a face width to height ratio of 1.886 which is in the ideal of 1.8+ so again is awarded the full +1 points

Mouth to nose ratio​

View attachment 112

He has the ratio of 1.5 here which again falls into the exact ideal range, so we will give him again +1 points for this area too!

Chin To Philtrum Ratio​

View attachment 113

Androgenic has a ratio of 2.79 here, however this falls slightly on the high end of the looksmax.cc WARS ratio, but acccording to some rating scales 2.2-2.8 is the ideal range for the chin to philtrum. Since it looks good but is definitely slightly larger than the aesthetic ideal (this is one reason he does look very high t and ogre) we will award him +0.9 points

Bizygomatic to Bigonial width​

View attachment 114​

Androgenics jaw width is 89% of his bizygomatic which is basically ideal, we could be harsh and say he is 1% off of the ideal, but I would argue that is insignificant, so we award him the full +1 points

Eye Separation Ratio​

View attachment 115

Androgenic has approximately 0.49 for his ESR falling slightly outside of the ideal range of 0.45 - 0.47 (this is due to his high facial width), But it is essentially ideal we award him +0.9 points

Gonial Angle​

View attachment 116

Androgenic has the gonial angle of 111 degrees. This is slightly less than the ideal range but very close we will award him 0.9 for this area too.

Canthal Tilt​

Androgenuc has positive canthal tilt with an angle of ~ 7 degrees, this is near ideal +1points
View attachment 117

Facial Fifths​

View attachment 118
Androgenic has fairly even facial widths so we award him 0.8 points for this.

Total Rating​

With the WARS rating averaging at (0.8+1+0.9+0.9+1+0.9+1+1+1 = 8.5
8.5 / 9 ~ 0.94

This is incredible, his ratios are near perfect, lets add his tall height (he claims 6'4) good frame and great body,

He also has great jawline, a great eye area with good lashes and brows, good coloring too

we rate androgenic an 8.5-9/10 in real life appeal!

Do you guys agree with this rating? And who should we rate next?

my favorite natty mogger

 

[Administrator]

my favorite natty mogger

He only ate towels and lifted natty broooo

Buy his course and he will tell you how ascend with masaii jumps brooooo

 

[homiespidy]

do orb next

 

[zyzz]

chad smv

 

[Administrator]

do orb next

Yesssir, if you have any good photos for the rating plz drop them here

 

[Administrator]

chad smv

Indeed he won with his height alone tho imho

 

[zyzz]

Indeed he won with his height alone tho imho

if he was lets say 5"10 and with the same face he whould most likely still slay

 

[Nigger]

if he was lets say 5"10 and with the same face he whould most likely still slay

Tbh, but frame and height are a huge halo for him I ageee with @Administrator

 

[etl🌲]

9/10 is too high tbh he's def between Lcl-Mcl in my opinion

 

[homiespidy]

9/10 is too high tbh he's def between Lcl-Mcl in my opinion

i think the rating is not just face but frame and height too

 

[etl🌲]

i think the rating is not just face but frame and height too

Yea but I don't think he's a 9/10 with all that maybe 8 but idk

 

[Sukhoi]

Androgenic is a famous australian roids mogger. He is well known for his huge frame, dimorphic look and tall height.

And he had one hell of an ascension!

Let's begin and see just how attractive he is on paper!

​

Midface Ratio​

View attachment 110

Androgenic has a great compact midface, very close to the ideal of 1 exactly he has a ratio of 1.04, this is close enough for us to give him the full +1 points for this area

FWHR​

View attachment 111

Androgenic has a face width to height ratio of 1.886 which is in the ideal of 1.8+ so again is awarded the full +1 points

Mouth to nose ratio​

View attachment 112

He has the ratio of 1.5 here which again falls into the exact ideal range, so we will give him again +1 points for this area too!

Chin To Philtrum Ratio​

View attachment 113

Androgenic has a ratio of 2.79 here, however this falls slightly on the high end of the looksmax.cc WARS ratio, but acccording to some rating scales 2.2-2.8 is the ideal range for the chin to philtrum. Since it looks good but is definitely slightly larger than the aesthetic ideal (this is one reason he does look very high t and ogre) we will award him +0.9 points

Bizygomatic to Bigonial width​

View attachment 114​

Androgenics jaw width is 89% of his bizygomatic which is basically ideal, we could be harsh and say he is 1% off of the ideal, but I would argue that is insignificant, so we award him the full +1 points

Eye Separation Ratio​

View attachment 115

Androgenic has approximately 0.49 for his ESR falling slightly outside of the ideal range of 0.45 - 0.47 (this is due to his high facial width), But it is essentially ideal we award him +0.9 points

Gonial Angle​

View attachment 116

Androgenic has the gonial angle of 111 degrees. This is slightly less than the ideal range but very close we will award him 0.9 for this area too.

Canthal Tilt​

Androgenuc has positive canthal tilt with an angle of ~ 7 degrees, this is near ideal +1points
View attachment 117

Facial Fifths​

View attachment 118
Androgenic has fairly even facial widths so we award him 0.8 points for this.

Total Rating​

With the WARS rating averaging at (0.8+1+0.9+0.9+1+0.9+1+1+1 = 8.5
8.5 / 9 ~ 0.94

This is incredible, his ratios are near perfect, lets add his tall height (he claims 6'4) good frame and great body,

He also has great jawline, a great eye area with good lashes and brows, good coloring too

we rate androgenic an 8.5-9/10 in real life appeal!

Do you guys agree with this rating? And who should we rate next?

i saw some of ur ratings and tbh i think you should look into this thread my friend sent me it seems to be far more detailed and has more things

https://looksmax.gg/threads/full-frontal-analysis-guide.11767/

 

[Administrator]

i saw some of ur ratings and tbh i think you should look into this thread my friend sent me it seems to be far more detailed and has more things

https://looksmax.gg/threads/full-frontal-analysis-guide.11767/

I agree, I am aware of this rating scale.

It is similar to that of faceiq and other autstic users.

I pride myself on actual aesthetics, being able to tell who has appeal and not is something innate and human..

The more ratios and requirements we have, it would imply some of the greatest moggers all look alike in some way. Or have similar traits.

This is untrue, as some traits have to fall within an ideal range, but otherwise one can actually tell whether or not someone has appeal and is attractive, and make an assessment out of 10, as to where they rank out of 100 people/

the true adams, for instance, being the best looking in 100 men (with the guys age group and competition), while a 5/10 is better looking than 50 men his age and who he directly competes with, but less good looking than 50.

I hope I explained this well, but ratios and harmony are one factor, the actual human eye is the best measure of aesthetics, it is inate within our genetics to know what is good looking and what is not

 

[Sukhoi]

I agree, I am aware of this rating scale.

It is similar to that of faceiq and other autstic users.

I pride myself on actual aesthetics, being able to tell who has appeal and not is something innate and human..

The more ratios and requirements we have, it would imply some of the greatest moggers all look alike in some way. Or have similar traits.

This is untrue, as some traits have to fall within an ideal range, but otherwise one can actually tell whether or not someone has appeal and is attractive, and make an assessment out of 10, as to where they rank out of 100 people/

the true adams, for instance, being the best looking in 100 men (with the guys age group and competition), while a 5/10 is better looking than 50 men his age and who he directly competes with, but less good looking than 50.

I hope I explained this well, but ratios and harmony are one factor, the actual human eye is the best measure of aesthetics, it is inate within our genetics to know what is good looking and what is not

id personally do out of 1k since past 1 out of 1k rarity the higher you go the quality of life difference starts going in the single digits by percentage of change and its gonna be un noticeable.
1-1k doesnt rlly mean alot to average ppl but the main dif comes at the higher tiers and i think its more diverse. your system also quite good tbh and i agree with the human eye the ratios are there to prove that what ur seeing is right and u need ratios to go past 0.5 or 0.25 if your very skilled in precision

 

[Administrator]

id personally do out of 1k since past 1 out of 1k rarity the higher you go the quality of life difference starts going in the single digits by percentage of change and its gonna be un noticeable.
1-1k doesnt rlly mean alot to average ppl but the main dif comes at the higher tiers and i think its more diverse. your system also quite good tbh and i agree with the human eye the ratios are there to prove that what ur seeing is right and u need ratios to go past 0.5 or 0.25 if your very skilled in precision

I agree with what you are saying all in all bro,

I agree, a larger population size is definitely easier when we are talking about 9.5/10 for instance.

I think for simplicity I choose to envision about 100 men as simply in my mind it makes sense with "top 1%" for instance

 

[Sukhoi]

I agree with what you are saying all in all bro,

I agree, a larger population size is definitely easier when we are talking about 9.5/10 for instance.

I think for simplicity I choose to envision about 100 men as simply in my mind it makes sense with "top 1%" for instance

yeah i see it 100 is easier to imagine

 

[Grilldaddy❤️]

Fascinating